| Home | Rankings | Majesty | History | Articles | K-1 |
Silly UFC Interview on the O'Rielly Factor
|
Bill
OfRielly is a sort of newsman who appears on ultra conservative FOX. I
have nothing against slanted news. Ifm all for bias. The only thing I
ask is that if someone is going to complain, he should know what he is
complaining about. OfRielly put the UFC in his cross hairs without,
Ifm certain, ever seeing an MMA bout. FOX invited Dana White and Rich
Franklin on the OfRielly Factor to talk about the UFC. Little did they
know that it was sabotage. Instead of being asked about the growth of the
sport and company, they were facing ludicrous questions about violence and
safety. This
is not news. This piece took place in 2005. The reason for this article is
because OfRiellyfs ignorance is not limited to him or one point in
time. There are flocks of misguided mother hens in the past, present and
future. The
intro opens with Bill OfRielly giving his description of the UFC, a
sport he knows nothing about. The visual on the right of the screen shows
a pair of boxing gloves for no apparent reason since MMA fighters donft
wear boxing gloves. OfRielly
says that the UFC is gSelling brutality. People come to see it because
they want to see violence. There is no question about that. I question
that. Why is it that when a man hits another who isnft look as in
gridiron or hockey it is called a sport but when the defender squares up
to protect himself it is called brutality? Sorry Bill. Fighting with rules
is a sport. It is a clean fight. In any case, I have discussed this in
another article (Kickboxing is
not a violent sport). Dana
White does his best on the spot to address the differences in between
boxing and MMA. He could have been clearer, but he did suggest that
increasing variety of attacks in not the same as increasing quantity of
attacks. The Ali example just complicates the discussion since 15-round
boxing is an extinct sport. That said, Ali is Billfs example so we have
to go with it. Forty-five (45) minutes of punches to the head is different
than 25 minutes of a wider variety of attacks and targets. Every knee to
the body is NOT a punch to the head. Every kick to the legs is NOT a punch
to the head. Grappling is NOT a punch to the head. Less time in a match
will mean that an MMA fighter will receive fewer punches to the head than
a boxer. In short, more variety in attacks means that the number of
attacks of one particular type (say, punches to the head) will decrease
not increase. I expect everyone with common sense to figure this out. The
dangers in MMA are not triple that of prizefighting, especially if we are
discussing brain injuries. OfRielly
also asks, gWhatfs next? Ancient OfRielly
quotes the British Journal of Sports Medicine stating that MMA has more
concussions that boxing. Before leaping to the results of a study like
this, one must judge the relevance of the observations. This particular
study was compiled using video footage. The paper had no access to medical
records. Furthermore, concussions donft result in permanent brain damage
anymore than getting extremely drunk on cheap gin. The terrifying damage
that gives doctors (and me) the shivers comes from repeated hits over a
long period, damage that has been stacked on top of previous damage. In
15-round boxing, rounds 13 to 15 separated not only the men from the boys,
but also the minds from the men. In brief, OfRielly exaggerated the
implications of a poorly compiled study. OfRielly
states that Muhammad Ali is in the advanced stages of Parkinsonfs. The
truth is that Ali does NOT have Parkinsonfs Disease. He suffers from
Parkinsonfs Syndrome. Perhaps Bill has Ali confused with another boxer
or perhaps Michael J. Fox. Lastly, OfRielly indicates that Muhammad Ali
says he got Parkinsonfs Disease from getting punched in the head. The
strength of this argument depends on an aged man with an IQ of 75
diagnosing himself without a medical degree or the necessary medical
equipment (which probably wonft exist until 2050 if ever). Seeing how I
like Ali, Ifd rather just accuse OfRielly of lying. As for mentioning
the Quarry brothers at the end of the interview, this is another extreme
example, probably worse than the Ali example. Jerry Quarry fought in the
1960s, 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. You wonft find anyone in boxing who is
against regulation to stop aging boxers from taking tragic risks. The
sad thing is that OfRielly tried to sabotage White and Professional
wrestling is extinct. It existed in the early 1900s but has since been
replaced by fake-wrestling. The sport has gone though the fans of the
fights stunts still call the spectacle pro wrestling. One of the reasons
for the disappearance of the sport was that matches were extremely easy to
fix and no one knew better. In no time, the number of fixed bouts
outnumbered the real ones. From there, the birth of fake-wrestling took
flight and today watching oversized men in costumes do fight stunts is
extremely popular. MMA
is also easy to fake. A knockout does NOT mean a fighter was unable to
continue. MMA does not offer 10-counts or 8-counts, so a briefly stunned
or off-balance fighter will often have to walk back to the locker room the
loser and unharmed. Early stoppages are accepted in real fights and can be
scripted into fake ones as well. Even
easier is to allow the fight to end with a technique that every kid in
judo class practices. Chokes and joint locks are brilliant techniques.
They also make MMA the only professional sport where an athlete can quit
without raising an eyebrow. People today still remember boxer Roberto
Duran saying, gNo mas!h The list of MMA fighters who have tapped out
is much longer and generally unquestioned. Sparring sessions, even, can
include a very large number of tapouts without any worries for safety.
Scripting a fight to end with a tapout is not difficult at all. The
MMA business model also bears a striking resemblance to fake-wrestling.
The titles are not from independent sanctioning organizations but from the
promotional companies themselves. Even Don King on his boldest day
wouldnft dream of creating a Don King Promotions Heavyweight Title, yet
that is exactly what the UFC and Pride have done. Pride has taken it one
step further, they have embraced pro wrestlers. Some have competed (or performed)
on shows. Some have acted as spokesmen for the company. In the early days,
discussions about fixed bouts were commonplace. When asked if he had
thrown the fight against Takada, Mark Coleman replied gI needed the
money.h That will probably be the last careless slip of the tongue but
not the last predetermined match in MMA. I donft know why Bill OfRielly decided to target MMA. I canft see why Republican voters from the American Bible Belt would take aim at a pro sport. Ifm mostly surprised that Bill would take a smug stance proceed to launch weak illogical attacks. Isnft targeting onefs best offense against an opponents worst defense common in all sports, wars and debates? This
interview can be viewed on Youtube (click
here.) |
@
| Home | Rankings | Majesty | History | Articles | K-1 |